Saturday, May 15, 2010

APP at the United Nations

On May 13, APP's Visiting Fellow Michael Davidson gave a speech at United Nations Headquarters in New York during the 18th Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development.

His address at a high-level round table segment on sustainable transportation focused on the need for reliable transportation systems in developing countries. Lack of these systems disproportionately affects youth and children in how they access basic services such as health and education, and impedes the attainment of the second Millennium Development Goal on universal primary education.

A video of the speech is available in the UN Webcast Archives. Click here to begin streaming. Davidson’s address starts at 2:16:50.

Photo by Michael Davidson

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Brooks to talk May 17 on Okinawa base politics



The Politics of Base Relocation in Okinawa 
The Futenma MCAS Negotiations 
1995-97 and 2005-06 
With 
Dr. William L. Brooks
Professorial lecturer in the SAIS Japan Studies Program 
and APP Senior Fellow

4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

Bernstein-Offit Building, Room 500
1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC

Photo lifted from here.

Public at peace with Japan's constitution

Polls show the Japanese public are losing interest in constitutional reform.

On May 3, Japan’s constitution marked its 63rd anniversary since its promulgation in 1947 under the MacArthur Occupation. To date, the document has yet to be amended, although there has been much talk about it and a spate of activity in recent years, particularly under the LDP administration of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (2006-7).

Every year, the major dailies on this day feature their own opinion polls on public attitudes toward the constitution and receptivity toward amending it. Although this year’s crop of polls by the Mainichi, Asahi, and Nikkei may vary slightly in the numbers, they all show strong support for the peace constitution and appreciation for its perceived contribution to the security of Japan nd the region. The polls also point to a trend in recent years of steady decline in public interest in changing the constitution, particularly the war-renouncing Article 9.

The Hatoyama government has quietly shelved debate on constitutional reform, despite the existence of a National Refendum Law coming into effect on May 18. Even more telling of the Democratic Party of Japan’s neglect of constitutional reform is the moribund state of constitutional examination committees (kenpou shinsakai) in both houses of the Diet. The panels have yet to meet since last September to fulfill their legal responsibility of setting up the procedures and rules for amending the constitution. Absent Diet debate on the subject, the Japanese public not surprisingly is paying less attention to this once hot-button issue in domestic politics. In fact, the Nikkei poll found 76% of Japanese unaware that procedures leading to constitutional reform would begin in May. Only 20% were savvy.

Mainichi’s poll, carried out April 17-18 as part of a general opinion survey, was the briefest, only asking respondents to give their opinion about whether they hoped to see the constitution amended or not. Views were split, with 50% saying “yes” and 48% saying “no.”

The Nikkei poll (March 3 edition, not on the Internet site) found 47% of the public supporting constitutional revision, the same level as in last year’s survey. It also found 40% of the public favoring keeping the Constitution just as it is. This was a 2-point rise from last year’s result. The gap is narrowing between those for and against amending the constitution.

In contrast, the opinion survey carried out by the Asahi also in mid-April, is more informative than the other two polls, underscoring a trend of eroding support for constitutional revision since the Abe administration. The survey found 47% of the general public in favor of amending the Constitution, with 39% against it. But this was a 10-point drop from the survey in 2007, Abe’s tenure, when positive views about constitutional revision accounted for 58% of the general public.

In the Asahi poll, the public was emphatic about Article 9, in which Japan renounces war and is barred from maintaining an armed force with war potential. Asked whether Article 9 should be changed, 67% said “no,” an increase of 3 points since the poll in 2008. But in the 2007 survey, only 49% were against Article 9 revision, with 33% favoring it. Since the 2008 survey, those negative about changing the article rose about 60%.

Asked in the current poll if they thought Article 9 was useful in maintaining peace in Japan and stability in the region, 70% answered affirmatively. Only 22% thought otherwise.

Picture from here.

William Brooks
Senior APP Fellow

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

A climate of trust with China

Climate Security in East Asia: New Opportunities for Non-traditional Cooperation* 
by Michael Davidson, Visiting Fellow at Asia Policy Point
Later this month, US Commerce Secretary Gary Locke goes to China to promote US clean energy technologies while Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton follow for the second round of the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. All will discuss ways to strengthen the US-China relationship by combating environmental degradation.
The security implications of climate change offer promising areas of cooperation between the US and China. Both countries agree on the potential damaging effects of climate change as well as on the need for coordinated international responses. However, US defense planners have not fully recognized the many benefits to be gained by cooperating with China on this front. Given the scale of the problem, a US-China climate security partnership could dwarf existing military cooperation and help stabilize the bilateral relationship.
“Securitization” of Climate Change
Global climate change threatens to increase the frequency and severity of natural disasters. Mitigating and adapting to these effects has significant security implications that defense ministries have only begun to acknowledge. The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) noted that “While climate change alone does not cause conflict, it may act as an accelerant of instability or conflict, placing a burden to respond on civilian institutions and militaries around the world.”
This year’s QDR – the first-ever to mention climate change – highlighted two important effects of climate and energy security: (1) the changing “operating environment, roles and missions” of US forces; and (2) the impact on military facilities and capabilities.
The changing roles and missions refer to the new and unpredictable requirements of providing disaster relief and humanitarian assistance. According to a 2007 report by the Center for Naval Analyses on which the QDR drew heavily, climate stresses can undermine public health infrastructure, destabilize economies, and contribute to a rise in terrorism.
The latter impact refers to, for example, the high price tag of delivering oil to the frontlines and the responsibility for mitigating climate change effects. The Department of Defense (DoD) has singled out military installations as a test bed for renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies. Furthermore, as part of President Obama’s executive order on federal sustainability, noncombat activities are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 34 percent in 2020.
In its 2008 white paper on defense, China highlighted energy conservation and ecological projects but failed to list their security implications. In other venues, such as the ASEAN Regional Forum, however, China has indicated the need to look beyond traditional security threats.
In a recent article, People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Maj. Gen. Luo Yuan called noncombat military activities overseas a “new mission for a new era” of the PLA. However, China has failed to keep up with the US, Japan, and other major powers in standardizing key elements of these activities such as personnel training and logistics support. This substantially restricts the PLA’s future presence abroad. He further emphasized that cooperation and dialogue are fundamental to these types of activities.

Dugong sighted off Nago, Japan


Click the Photo
QAB (Ryukyu Asahi Broadcasting) footage of a dugong witnessed 
on the morning of May 12 off the coast of Nago - 4 KM north of Camp Schwab

Pedaling Peril

In March, the US Government Accountability Office issued it report on Firms Reported in Open Sources as Having Commercial Activity in Iran's Oil, Gas, and Petrochemical Sectors [GAO-10-515R March 23, 2010]. The report noted the following companies as still doing business in Iran:
Japan’s INPEX Corp.and JGC Corp; Austria's OMV AG, Brazil's Petrobras and China National Pertoleum Corp. and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. from China. Also on the list were Total SA from France, Eni SpA from Italy, Russia's Gazprom and Lukoil, Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. from South Korea, and Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

This week the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a full committee hearing May 12th on "Iran Sanctions: Why Does the U.S. Government Do Business With Companies Doing Business in Iran?" with Congressman Ted Deutsch, U.S. House of Representatives; Joseph A. Christoff, Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. Government Accountability Office; Danielle Pietka, Vice President, Foreign and Defense Policy Studies, AEI for Public Policy Research. 

Following the hearing, there will be a number of programs exploring the issues brought up by the nuclearization of Iran and pending legislation to toughen sanctions against companies doing business with Iran (Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act, H.R. 2194 and S. 908).
  
PEDDLING PERIL: HOW THE SECRET NUCLEAR ARMS AMERICA’S ENEMIES. 5/13, 10:00am-Noon, Washington, DC. Sponsor: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Speakers: David Albright, President, Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS); Dr. Matthew Kroenig, Assistant Professor, Georgetown University Department of Government; Dr. Catherine Lotrionte, Assistant Director, Georgetown Institute for Law, Science, and Global Security; Williams Reinsch, President, National Foreign Trade Council; Edmund Rice, Senior Professional Staff Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee. 

WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS: SOUND POLICY OR DANGEROUS ILLUSION. 5/13, Noon-2:00pm, Washington, DC. Sponsor: American Society of International Law (ASIL). Speakers: Amb. Thomas Pickering, Former Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs; Frank Gaffney, Former Assistant Defense Secretary for International Security Policy. 

EXPORTING THE BOMB: TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE SPREAD OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS. 5/14, Noon-1:30pm, Washington, DC. Sponsor: Wilson Center (WWC). Speaker: Matthew Kroenig, Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Georgetown University.

GETTING SANCTIONS RIGHT: PERSPECTIVES ON THE IRAN SANCTIONS LEGISLATION. 5/12, 9:00-10:30am, Washington, DC. Sponsor: Global Business Dialogue. Speakers: William Reinsch, National Foreign Trade Council; Catherine Robinson, NAM; Christopher Wenk, U.S. Chamber of Commerce; L. Charles Landgraf, Dewey & LeBoeuf.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Who said Washingtonians are no fun

Make it fun for 
Asian Pacific American Month


BOLLYWOOD FLASH MOB
 SHOWTIME!!
Saturday May 22, 1pm
Fiesta Asia Street Fair 
Pennsylvania Ave NW & 3rd St NW
Call Time 12.30pm (Wear Orange/Yellow!) 

The organizers of Washington, DC's Fiesta Asia Street Fair are looking for 300 or more people to do the 1st ever Bollywood Flash Mob Dance Street Style on Pennsylvania Ave "spontaneously"
Watch the video above or go to one of the classes noted on the Fiesta website

Join APP interns at the Fiesta!

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Kim Jong Il visits China

Kim Jong Il has visited China four times since 2000, each time by train and each time under hush-hush circumstances. This week was his latest trip, lasting from May 3 to May 7th.

The following is a list of participants at a meeting between Chinese President Hu Jintao and North Korean leader Kim Jong Il at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Wednesday, May 5th as reported by the Chinese media on Friday.

China: -- Hu Jintao, president -- Xi Jinping, vice president -- Dai Bingguo, state councilor -- Wang Jiarui, head of the Communist Party's International Department -- Ling Jihua, director of the General Office of the party's Central Committee -- Yang Jiechi, foreign minister -- Liu Hongcai, ambassador to North Korea 


North Korea: -- Kim Jong Il, general secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea -- Kang Sok Ju, first vice foreign minister -- Kim Yang Gon, director of the party's United Front Department -- Kim Yong Il, director of the party's International Department.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

No fighting in the war room

Twelve of the 47 nations attending the April 12-13 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, DC were Asian. Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama reportedly gave the keynote address at the working dinner on the first night.

Eleven of these countries issued national statements or commitments outlining what they planned to do to lessen the risks of nuclear annihilation.

The Summit's attendees approved a Communique to advance a common approach and commitment to nuclear security. Leaders in attendance renewed their commitment to ensure that nuclear materials under their control are not stolen or diverted for use by terrorists, and pledged to continue to evaluate the threat and improve the security as changing conditions may require, and to exchange best practices and practical solutions for doing so.

The United States pledged to promote sustainable domestic nuclear security programs; minimize highly enriched uranium; plutonium disposition; ratifying international convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism and the 2005 Amendment to the Convention on the physical Protection of Nuclear Material; develop new neutron detection technologies; voluntary fund for UN Security Council Resolution 1540; and fund Nuclear Security Programme of IAEA.

Many states made commitments to support the Summit either by taking national actions to increase nuclear security domestically or by working through bilateral or multilateral mechanisms to improve security globally. Eleven of the 12 Asian nations attending issued national statements or commitments at the Summit.

Links to these statements and who was the country representative are as follows. Unfortunately, most national statements cannot be found on the Internet and many of the links below are simply to articles about them.

CHINA

Representative of China: Hu Jintao, President of China
Announced cooperation on nuclear security Center of Excellence

INDIA

Representative of India: Dr, Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister
Announced the creation of a Nuclear Energy Center with a nuclear security component

INDONESIA

Representative of Indonesia: Dr, Boediono, Vice President
The final agreement is still being drafted. Indonesia will keep its position based on their basic principles.

JAPAN

Representative of Japan: Yukio Hatoyama, Prime Minister of Japan
Launching an integrated regional support center; research and development on detection and forensics; contributing new resources to International Atomic Energy Agency’s Nuclear Security Fund; hosting and funding a World Institute of Nuclear Security best practices conference.

KAZAKHSTAN

Representative of Kazakhstan: Nursultan Nazarbayev, President of Kazakhstan.

Converting a highly enriched uranium research reactor and eliminating remaining highly enriched uranium; cooperative work on BN-350 rector shutdown and fuel security; hosting a Global Initiative Activity in June; considering a International Nuclear Security Training Center

MALAYSIA

Representative of Malaysia: Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak, Prime Minister of Malaysia
Passed new export control law.

NEW ZEALAND

Representative of New Zealand: John Key, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Contributing to International Atomic Energy Agency’s Nuclear Security Fund; contributing to the U.S. Nuclear Smuggling Outreach Initiative.

PHILIPPINES

Representative of Philippines: Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, President of Philippines
Joining the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism.

SINGAPORE

Representative of Singapore: Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister
Strategic Goods (Control) Act (SGCA) includes a catch-all provision, brokering controls, sharing of intelligence with other countries, and controls on the Intangible Transfer of Technology (ITT). Singapore has adopted a number of Regulations and administrative measures. Singapore also complies with FATF guidelines to combat proliferation financing.

SOUTH KOREA

Representative of Korea: Myung-bak Lee, President
Hosting 2012 Nuclear Security Summit; hosting a Global Initiative activity.

THAILAND

Representative of Thailand: Trairong Suwannakhiri, Deputy Prime Minister
Joining the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism.

VIETNAM

Representative of Vietnam: Nguyen Tan Dung, Prime Minister of Vietnam
Converting a highly enriched uranium research reactor; joining the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

World Bank & IMF Meetings


Washington hosted the annual IMF/World Bank spring meetings April 24 to 25. This year's protest were quite subdued and less colorful than in past years. Following the meetings and international development  issue have never been easier. There was a blog and a number of significant reports:

For the researcher, the most significant release of the meeting was the announcement that the World Bank Group will now offer free access to more than 2,000 financial, business, health, economic and human development statistics. An initial 330 indicators are available in French, Spanish and Arabic. The new website is http://data.worldbank.org.

Meeting Site: http://www.imf.org/external/spring/2010/index.htm
World Bank Meetings Blog: http://blogs.worldbank.org/meetings
Global Monitoring Report 2010: The MDGs after the Crisis, http://go.worldbank.org/8NMBGII280
World Economic Outlook, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/index.htm
Global Financial Stability Report, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2010/01/index.htm
East Asia & Pacific on the Rise Blog, http://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific

Organizations relevant to the study of international finance and development in Washington,

Peterson Institute for International Economics, http://www.iie.com
Institute of International Finance, http://www.iif.com
Center for Global Development, http://www.cgdev.org
Society for International Development, http://www.sidint.org

Voters driven to distraction as Hatoyama destination is becoming known

There does not appear to be any way for Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama to head off the political train wreck coming his way.

With his popularity having reached even more dangerous lows – 20 to 24 percent range -- in the latest polls, an inquest panel’s finding this week that DPJ Secretary General Ichiro Ozawa should be indicted for his money scandals, and news of his seemingly desperate decision on Futenma relocation that is only likely to bring the wrath of Okinawa down on his head, the Prime Minister seems to be coming off the rails. He has no allies in the press, with even liberal dailies friendly to the DPJ decrying his mishandling of the issues. The Western press continues also to hammer him for allegedly creating a crisis in the US-Japan alliance over the Futenma issue.

The consensus in the press, and among a growing number in his party, seems to be that Hatoyama simply cannot lead his party into the summer Upper House election with a support rate now around 20% and falling. The result would be a disaster. It would not be surprising to have him first seal up a highly unpopular deal on Futenma and then, taking responsibility for breaking a campaign pledge to move the facility out of Okinawa Prefecture, resign his seat as prime minister to make way for a more popular leader. Rumors have Finance Minister Naoto Kan, a popular figure in Japanese politics, to take the driver's seat prior to the election campaign period.

After months of hemming and hawing on where to relocate Futenma, a Marine Corps base located in downtown Ginowan City on Okinawa, and floating just about every conceivable site proposal ranging from Kyushu to Guam, the Hatoyama government, reportedly has decided, apparently in desperation, to return to square one and opt for the original relocation plan from 2006 with some modifications.

Since Hatoyama promised in last year’s election campaign to move Futenma out of the prefecture, his reneging will inevitably outrage Okinawa, where only last week approximately 90,000 demonstrators* angrily protested against any agreement that resulted in Futenma being relocated inside the prefecture. The DPJ’s coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party, already has flatly come out against the plan. It is no wonder that the controversial decision was leaked to the press at the start of the Golden Week consecutive holidays, when people are on vacation and less attentive to the news.

According to the business daily Nikkei on April 29, the US government has been informed that: 1) the current plan to reclaim land along the shore line of Camp Schwab will be revised and altered to a more environmentally-friendly construction method that would involve installing a pier supported by posts; and 2) a portion of the training by the helicopter unit will be carried out on a scale of up to 1,000 troops on Tokunoshima, an island in Kagoshima Prefecture. Prime Minister Hatoyama plans to visit Okinawa May 4 to explain the new plan to Governor Nakaima. Working-level talks on the new plan will start possibly in early May.

The revised relocation plan, the third iteration since the 1995 SACO agreement, is a combination of a 1996 proposal to build a sea-based runway off Henoko and a 2006 revision to build the runway along the shoreline of Camp Schwab, with parts of it jutting into the sea. The revised plan if implemented would finally allow for the closure of Futenma, eliminating the potential danger there of another helicopter crash like the one in 2004 into an adjacent university campus, where miraculously no civilians were hurt.

The proposal to remove training to Tokunoshima, which has an existing runway, is an obvious attempt to convince Okinawa to somehow swallow the decision not to remove the helicopter unit from the prefecture. Even if the U.S. concurs with the new plan, there is no guarantee that the residents of Tokunoshima, half of whom turned out recently to protest any relocation of Marines to their island, will change their tune. And Okinawans, too, seem unlikely to forgive Hatoyama for a decision that the residents will paint as a betrayal of trust. Implementing the third iteration of the Futenma relocation plan may prove to be just as elusive as its predecessors.

Ozawa once more on hot seat

Hatoyama also faces the nation’s severe judgment for keeping in place a party leader who most Japanese want to see out of power, as the polls have repeatedly shown. The latest blow for the Prime Minister was the news on April 28 that an inquest panel had ruled DPJ Secretary General should be indicted for alleged violation of the Political Funds Control Law, even though the Tokyo District Prosecutors Office earlier this year decided not to prosecute, citing insufficient evidence. Prosecutors are now obliged to reinvestigate the case, which makes it all the more likely Ozawa will eventually be indicted. Though editorials and the public in the latest polls are clamoring for Ozawa to quit his post, the DPJ powerbroker continues to stonewall.

The Japanese public, which will soon go to the polls in the Upper House election this summer, have not only given up on the Hatoyama Cabinet, they also have turned aside from the DPJ as the party of choice. The latest round of opinion polls released this week all show Hatoyama’s popularity at an abysmally low 20-24 percent range, reminiscent of the status of the last three LDP prime minister’s before they left office.

The surveys also show rapid decline in the DPJ’s support rate, with voters either joining the unaffiliated ranks or opting to support small splinter parties. The former ruling LDP, now in shambles with defectors leaving to form mini-parties or become independents, has little appeal for disaffected voters. Even if the DPJ switches to a more popular leader and rids itself of the albatross that Ozawa has become, it seems unlikely that it will score a victory in the election, though it is too early to predict how bad the result will be. Japanese politics seems to settling into yet another long, hot summer of voter discontent.

Dr. William Brooks
APP Senior Fellow

*Japan's National Police Agency, however, estimates the crowd to be closer to only 25,000 and the US Consulate on Okinawa estimates it to have been 40,000 to 45,000 people.