Sunday, November 9, 2025

PM Takaichi’s Week of Diplomacy

Staying the Abe Course


By Takuya Nishimura
, Senior Fellow, Asia Policy Point
Former editorial writer for the Hokkaido Shimbun
You can find his blog, J Update here.
November 3, 2025

The last week of October 2025 was Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s diplomatic debut. Inaugurated barely a week before, she spoke with world leaders and attended multi-lateral conferences. Takaichi hoped to project Japan’s importance in international community. While she is still on her way to that goal, it became clear that her foreign policy will be based on that of her predecessors – mainly, Abe.

The Golden Age of Alliances
Takaichi prepared for her diplomatic week by focusing on U.S. President Donald Trump’s state visit from October 27 to 29. In her meeting with Trump, Takaichi reminisced about his old friend and her political mentor, former prime minister Shinzo Abe. She gave Trump a golf putter used by Abe and a set of gold-gilded golf balls, acknowledging Trump’s fondness of golf and gold. The two signed a document titled “Toward a NEW GOLDEN AGE,” named after a sentence in Trump’s inaugural address in January: “The golden age of America begins right now.”

In addition to the gift-giving, and without any explicit request from Trump, Takaichi described to him Japan’s initiative to increase its defense spending. Takaichi earlier had announced to the Diet that Japan would reach its defense budget target of two percent of GDP earlier than expected. Japan also will revise three defense documents signed in 2022 to increase its purchases of military equipment from the U.S. On this latter commitment, Takaichi took a page from Abe’s book. In 2018, as Trump was considering higher tariffs on Japanese cars, Abe bought F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment from the U.S.

Both leaders labeled the bilateral tariff agreement in July as a “great deal.” They exchanged a joint factsheet on the anticipated 60 trillion yen of investments in the U.S. by Japanese companies. The factsheet shows only “interest from companies.” One example of a possible investment is the construction of nuclear reactors and small modular reactors by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Toshiba. Notwithstanding the lack of firm commitments, the factsheet was a diplomatic card that Trump could play in a summit talk with President Xi Jinping of China after he left Japan.

Helped by Pragmatic Diplomacy
Abe’s legacy was not a resource for Takaichi in her meeting with the President of the Republic of Korea (ROK), Lee Jae Myung, during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Gyeongju on October 30. During his time in office, Abe had brought Japan-ROK relations to their lowest level since 1965, when the two countries normalized diplomatic relations. Note that while Abe was in office, a liberal, Moon Jae In, headed the ROK government. Moon was a political mentor of President Lee, just as Abe was of Takaichi.

The stage thus was set for renewed antagonism between the heirs to the Abe and Moon administrations. That drama did not take place, however. Takaichi was lucky enough on three points. First, Lee holds to the principle of “pragmatic diplomacy” and is trying to solidify relations with foreign countries. Second, Takaichi’s predecessor, Shigeru Ishiba, had improved bilateral relations with the ROK and then-President Yoon Suk Yeol. Finally, Japan and the ROK need to reinforce their trilateral security framework with the U.S. to counter the growing military alliance of China, Russia, and North Korea.

Takaichi and Lee promised to maintain a “shuttle diplomacy” with frequent visits to each other. In the ROK, Takaichi is widely considered a hawkish leader, who frequently visits the Yasukuni Shrine, where war criminals are enshrined, and who disagrees with both the Murayama Statement, which is an apology for Japan’s wartime aggression, and the Kono Statement, which admits the Japanese Imperial Armed Force’s role in trafficking women and girls. Avoiding these issues, Takaichi tried to build a personal relationship with Lee, expressing her preferences for Korean seaweed, Korean cosmetics, and Korean TV drama.

An Unusual Exchange on Domestic Issues
Takaichi’s meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Gyeongju on October 31 did not go as smoothly as the meetings with Trump and Lee. Both leaders met and shook hands without a smile.

Takaichi is one of the lawmakers who are close to Taiwan. She had visited Taiwan and met with President Lai Ching-te in April. Lai immediately congratulated Takaichi on her election as president of the Liberal Democratic Party in early October, and her colleagues brought a message from her to Lai in their visit to Taiwan. Takaichi obviously is not a preferable counterpart for Xi.

Xi referred to the Murayama Statement as embodying a spirit of contrition that should be upheld. Takaichi expressed serious concerns over China’s escalation of maritime survey and military activities in the East China Sea, including around the Senkaku Island and in the South China Sea. She also criticized China’s oppression in Hong Kong and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It was unusual for the leaders to discuss the domestic issues of their counterparts.

Although Takaichi hoped to make progress on some concerns, such as easing regulations on the import of sea products from Japan and taking greater safety measures for the Japanese in China, Xi did not offer any clear commitment. They at least agreed on maintaining an old bilateral diplomatic principle, a “mutually beneficial relationship based on common strategic interests,” a term originated in the first Abe administration.

Distance from Center Stage
In her first policy speech to the Diet on October 24, Takaichi invoked the Abe policy of a “Japanese diplomacy that flourishes on the world’s center stage.” The diplomatic week was the premiere of Takaichi’s role on that stage. It is a work in progress, as Takaichi insisted in her press conference at the end of the week that her diplomacy had just begun.

In one instance, on October 26, at the Japan-ASEAN summit meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Takaichi prompted collaboration between the Free and Open Asia Pacific (FOIP) and another framework, the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP). The FOIP concept was invented by Abe in 2016. However, Takaichi’s proposed collaboration remains focused on traditional economic cooperation for building infrastructure. ASEAN still faces a choice between Japan and China as the country to cooperate with.

At another meeting, the APEC summit at Gyeongju on October 31, Takaichi proposed active investment to support innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technology in order to enhance resilience in responding to natural disaster. In her policy speech to the Diet, Takaichi spoke of “investment for crisis management” and promised to make Japan “the world’s best country to develop and use AI.” Nevertheless, there is no AI in Japan that is as prevalent in the world as ChatGPT or Copilot. So far, it is unclear how she will have Japan flourish on the world’s stage.

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

All things Gozilla


 


Zenzilla Garden T-shirt
Japanese American National Musuem






Godzilla: The Official Coloring Book
Japanese American National Musuem



Godzilla Monopoly
Japanese American National Museum
 




Love from Godzilla
Japanese American National Museum















Museum of Modern Art









Museum of Modern Art







Asia Policy Point receives a small commission only from sales on Amazon.

Sunday, November 2, 2025

Asia Policy Events, Monday November 3, 2025

HOW TO CATCH A WAR CRIMINAL IN THE 21ST CENTURY. 11/3, 10:00am-5:00pm (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Reckoning Project; Genocide Studies Program, Yale University. Speakers: David Simon, Director, Genocide Study Department, Yale University; Janine di Giovanni, CEO, Reckoning Project; Christiaan Triebert, New York Times; Aslı Ü. Bâli, Professor of Law, Yale University; Reed Brody, Board Member, DAWN MENA; Nathaniel Raymond, ED, Humanitarian Research Lab; Nick Leddy, Head of Litigation, Legal Action Worldwide. 

FADE TO BLUE? WHAT THE REVAMPED SENATE REVEALS ABOUT THAILAND’S POLITICS. 11/3, 10:30-11:30am (SGT), 11/2, 11:30pm-12:30am (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute. Speaker: Dr. Duncan McCargo, President’s Chair in Global Affairs, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. 

DECODING TRUMP’S ASIA VISIT. 11/3, Noon (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Foreign Policy LIVE. Speakers: Elizabeth Economy, Former Senior China Advisor, U.S. Commerce Department; Ravi Agrawal, Editor in Chief, Foreign Policy

SECURITY DILEMMA AND US-CHINA GENERATIVE AI RACE. 11/3, 12:15-1:45pm (CET), 6:15-7:45am (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Berlin Contemporary China Network. Speaker: Jinghan Zeng, Professor, City University of Hong Kong; Author.

APEC SOUTH KOREA 2025. 11/3, 8:00am (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Korea Society. Speakers: Jaemin Lee, Professor of Law/Dean, School of Law, Seoul National University; Kate Kalutkiewicz, Senior Managing Director, McLarty Inbound; Scott Jacobs, Head of Global Public Policy, Coupang. 

CONGRESSMAN RICH MCCORMICK ON SECURING AMERICAN AI LEADERSHIP. 11/3, 10:00-11:00am (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Hudson Institute. Speakers: Congressman Rich McCormick, United States Representative, Seventh District of Georgia; Jason Hsu, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute.

CHINA’S ECONOMIC PRIORITIES: THE FOURTH PLENUM IN REVIEW. 11/3, 10:00-11:00am (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Brookings. Speakers: Kari Heerman, Director, Trade and Economic Statecraft, Brookings; Ilaria Mazzocco, Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Trustee Chair in Chinese Business and Economics, CSIS; Oliver Melton, Director, China Practice, Rhodium Group; Andrew Polk, Co-Founder and Head of Economic Research, Trivium China. 

AMERICA AT HOME AND ABROAD: A CONVERSATION WITH NICHOLAS KRISTOF. 11/3, 11:00-11:45am (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Carnegie. Speakers: Aaron David Miller, Senior Fellow, American Statecraft Program; Nicholas Kristof, Op-Ed Columnist, The New York Times.

FEDERAL RESERVE GOVERNOR LISA COOK: THE OUTLOOK FOR THE ECONOMY AND MONETARY POLICY. 11/3, 2:00-2:50pm (EST), HYBRID. Sponsor: Brookings. Speakers: David Wessel, Director, Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Senior Fellow, Economic Studies, Brookings; Lisa D. Cook, Member, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System. 

ICAS FALL SYMPOSIUM: THE TRUMP DOCTRINE: NATIONAL SECURITY AND BEYOND. 11/3, 7:00-8:15pm (EST), VIRTUAL. Sponsor: Institute for Corean-American Studies, Inc. (ICAS). Speaker: Fred Fleitz, Vice Chair of American Security, America First Policy Institute (AFPI).

Prime Minister Takaichi’s First Policy Speech


Ambitions Lacking Details



By Takuya Nishimura, Senior Fellow, Asia Policy PointYou can find his blog, J Update here
November 1, 2025

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivered her first policy speech to the extraordinary Diet session on October 24. She emphasized that her administration would make the Japanese economy and Japan itself stronger. However, it was not at all clear how she would do so or how Japan will fare under her leadership. One thing that was clear was her commitment to follow the policies of the former Shinzo Abe administration, which she greatly admires.

“I will strive to build a robust economy, turning people’s unease and apprehension over their current lives and the future into hope and foster a Japan that is stronger and more prosperous,” Takaichi said. She was adamant that she would restore Japanese diplomacy so that it “flourishes on the world’s center stage” – a term coined by Abe when he advocated for an active role for Japan in the world.

One question remains: What exactly is a strong economy? A “responsible and proactive public finances” is Takaichi’s main concept. She calls for bold governmental spending, which, she says, will raise incomes, transform people’s mindsets regarding consumption, and boost tax revenues without raising tax rates as business earnings increase. She aims to curb the growth of Japan’s outstanding debt so as not to exceed the rate of economic growth and lower Japan’s ratio of outstanding government debt to GDP.

This concept does not differ in any significant way from the “economic virtuous cycle” that former administrations had hoped to achieve. However, neither Abe nor other prime ministers were able to grow real wages. As these administrations poured money into the market by issuing government bonds, wages could not catch up with price hikes. While Takaichi and her allies have great nostalgia for Abenomics, that policy was a remedy for deflation, not for inflation from which the Japanese public is now suffering.

When she talks about responsibility for economic policies, Takaichi must show fiscal resources that will give effect to her policies. She promised in her policy speech that her administration would pass a bill in the current session of the Diet to remove the provisional gasoline tax rate. But she did not propose how she would find the fiscal resources to make up for lost revenue.

Takaichi listed several policies her administration would pursue, including subsidies for the wages of workers in medical services and nursing care facilities, for local communities to support small and mid-size entrepreneurs, and for payments to high schools for school lunches. But she never explained how she would pay for them. It is notable that, during her campaign for the presidency of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), Takaichi did not rule out issuing government bonds to fund her economic policies.

Takaichi also introduced the concept of “crisis management investment.” She defines it as strategic investments “to address various risks and social issues, including economic security, food security, energy security, health and medical security, and measures to enhance national resilience” with coordination between the private sector and the government. Another goal is to advance Japan as “the world’s best country to develop and use AI.” To implement this economic agenda, she proposed establishing a “Council for Japan’s Growth Strategy.”

LDP governments have long used disaster management to justify expenditures for infrastructure construction. Mirroring the views of her immediate predecessor, Shigeru Ishiba, Takaichi stressed the need to prepare for the Nankai Trough Great Earthquake and to continue reconstruction following the great earthquakes in northeast Japan in 2011 and Noto Peninsula in 2024.

Takaichi’s respect for Abe comes through in her diplomatic policies. A “Free and Open Asia-Pacific (FOAP)” is at the center of her foreign policy. Abe proposed FOAP in 2016 to counter Chinese advances in the region. Takaichi appointed Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MOFA) official, Keiichi Ichikawa, to be the new Secretary General of the National Security Secretariat. Ichikawa originated the idea of FOAP in MOFA. 

Takaichi also declared that she would take “front-loaded measures” to increase the defense budget to two percent of GDP within FY2025. Former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida assumed that income tax, corporate tax, and tobacco tax revenues would fund the two percent commitment. Takaichi has yet to adopt that view, and she has not indicated how she would pay for the increase in the defense budget.

As a practical matter, the most important agenda item for the Takaichi administration is how to ensure the survival of her current minority government. Yet, she did not meaningfully address the priority policy of her coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party (JIP) – a reduction in the number of Diet seats. This reduction was the “absolute condition” for the JIP to enter a coalition with the LDP. In her speech, Takaichi did not mention any reduction at all, instead referring to the policy as social security reform. But it is nothing more to her than a topic to “discuss quickly.” 

Takaichi also omitted any mention of campaign financing reform, namely the prohibition of donations from companies and organizations. The LDP’s resistance to reform was the greatest reason Komeito left the coalition with the LDP. Indeed, far from pursuing reform, Takaichi appointed lawmakers who had been involved in the kickback fund scandal, to positions in her government and on the LDP board. Her indifference to political reform may engender some criticism.